Legal Opinion

Kalker v. Bailen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is an action of contract to recover a balance alleged to be due to the plaintiff for his services in arranging for an extension of certain mortgages. The defendant has pleaded that if any promise on his part to pay the plaintiff is proved, it was an oral promise to pay the debt of another and was unenforceable by reason of the statute of frauds, G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 259, § 1, Second.

The trustees of the “I. & S. Realty Trust,” hereinafter called the trust, owned certain lands and buildings on Linnaean Street and on Washington Avenue in Cambridge. Each of the two parcels was subject to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Corn v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  2. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Ames v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Furbish v. GoodnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gordon v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Fichera v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Beaver v. Raytheon Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Hayes v. GuyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API