Legal Opinion

Wilson v. King

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1964No. 1477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL, Judge.

The substituted plaintiffs in this suit (the original plaintiff was deceased) obtained a writ of fieri facias and made the Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans garnishee for the purpose of satisfying a money judgment against the defendant, Carleton King. At the time the interrogatories were served the bank held the sum of $3,935.85 for the joint account of Carleton King and Grace King Coxe. The latter died after the issuance of the writ and the administrator of her succession intervened, alleging that the judgment debtor, Carleton King, had no interest in the funds seized and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Gueno v. MedlenkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  3. In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guidry v. Bank of LaPlaceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  2. Doescher v. MarcotteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Wilson v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API