Wilson v. King

YARRUT, Judge.

This suit is the sequel to the one decided by this Court on June 1, 1964 (Wilson v. King, 165 So.2d 70). The issue here is whether the successful Intervenor in the first suit (Administrator of the Succession of Grace King Coxe) is entitled to recover interest for the period the garnisheed funds, then on deposit with the Bank, were withheld, as well as attorney’s fees incurred in releasing the garnishment.

The heirs of original Plaintiff, Albert A. Wilson, were substituted as Plaintiffs in the cited suit. They obtained a writ of fieri facias and made the Hibernia National Bank in…