Legal Opinion

United States v. Articles of Drug ... Promise Toothpaste for Sensitive Teeth

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 30, 1984No. 83 C 6129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge:

In this action the United States proceeds on libel of information against several cartons of toothpaste, and seeks injunctive relief against the manufacturer, Block Drug Company, Inc. (“Block”), and its officers Leonard N. Block and James A. Block. Block has filed a claim in the in rem proceeding. The toothpaste, by combining two active ingredients, is intended to combat both caries and dentinal hypersensitivity. This particular combination of active ingredients apparently has never been marketed before, and the United States alleges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ciba Corp. v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Wende McIlwain v. Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr., Commissioner, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. IMS LTD. v. CalifanoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API