Legal Opinion

State v. Pendergrass

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1993No. 9228SC752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in denying defendant’s motion to sever defendant’s trial from that of his code-fendant Rhoda Bruington, (2) in denying defendant’s motion for change of venue, (3) in failing to dismiss the charge of second degree kidnapping of the infant, and (4) in failing to dismiss the charges of first degree kidnapping of two of the victims. We find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to sever defendant’s trial from that of his codefendant, Rhoda…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. LundyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API