Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Etter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteeee, J.

This suit was commenced November 29, 1920, by plaintiff, McMillan, to enjoin defendants from rebuilding a dam or flume which had supplied water to a mill at a small hamlet called Nicholsville, in Volinia township, Cass county. A temporary injunction was granted. Defendants answered, asking affirmative relief by cross-bill to which McMillan answered at length. During hearing of the case it was admitted the import of the relief asked by defendants’ cross-bill was for specific performance of a land contract from McMillan to defendant Etter given the preceding March, duly witnessed and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Goodrich v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Winchell v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Harrodsburg v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API