Winchell v. Clark
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Trespass for the removal of a dam alleged to be a nuisance. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sued in justice’s court for damages arising from an alleged trespass upon her property, in that the- said defendant, with force and arms, entered her close, and tore down and destroyed a certain stone dam thereon, erected and maintained by her, and used to dam up the waters of the Kalamazoo river for manufacturing purposes.
The defendant gave notice that, at the time of the alleged trespass, he was in possession of the premises where the dam was located; that the dam wrongfully overflowed his premises, and that, if he committed any act as charged in the plaintiff’s declaration,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hall v. City of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dummer v. United States Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- McMillan v. EtterMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- McLeod v. Miller & LuxNevada Supreme Court · 1917