Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. Miner v. Lorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Information to test right to exercise franchise of a corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is a proceeding by information in the nature of a quo warranto to determine the rights of respondents to exercise the franchises of a corporation organized under “An act to authorize the formation of corporations for mining, smelting, or niaufacturing iron, copper, mineral, coal, silver, or other ores or minerals, and for other manufacturing purposes,” approved February 5, 1853. The respondents pleaded to the information, therein setting forth, (1) articles of association executed by them under and by virtue of the above act, on the fifth day of January, A. D. 1874, and duly filed as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Schriefer v. WoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1864
  3. United States v. HathawaySupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gitzhoffen v. Sisters of Holy Cross Hospital Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Attorney General v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. State Ex Rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API