Legal Opinion

United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 10, 2002No. 01-1005, 01-1016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Darwin Jay Copeland and Anthony Antoine Hartwell appeal their convictions and sentences stemming from charges of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846 and for possession of a firearm by a felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The defendants collectively raise seven claims on appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Copeland and Hartwell (“the defendants”) were alleged to be members of an elaborate drug operation in the Flint, Michigan area. On…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Bobby Marshall ZidellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. SaikalyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Copeland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API