Legal Opinion

Nichols v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 29, 2009No. 05-6452PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

We granted en banc review to decide an important constitutional question: whether — and if so, under what conditions — a criminal defense attorney renders “deficient performance” under Strickland’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel rubric by failing to preserve a future-change-in-the-law argument in the hope that the Supreme Court will strike down the existing law while that defendant’s case is still pending on direct appeal.

But, because this particular defendant cannot prevail on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in any event, inasmuch…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Freddie Chase v. Matt MaCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. Muniz v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Charles Ahumada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Toth v. CallaghanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API