Legal Opinion
Kimball v. Callahan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 1979No. 77-2628PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
Appellants, the members and directors of the Oregon State Game Commission and the director of the Oregon State Patrol and Oregon Game Enforcement Division, have appealed from a judgment declaring that appellees, five Klamath Indians and the Klamath Indian Game Commission, and the members of the Klamath Indian Tribe are “entitled to the rights, privileges and immunities afforded under the Treaty of October 14,1864, between the Klamath Indian Tribe and the United States to hunt, trap and fish within their ancestral Klamath Indian Reservation as it existed at the time of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey and Jerry Howard, Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey Steve VincentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Duran v. City Of DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. The State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.