Legal Opinion
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. The State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1980No. 78-1570PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma, plaintiff-appellant, sought to enjoin defendant-appellee State of Oklahoma from the exercise of jurisdiction over Indian hunting and fishing on land located within the reservation established by certain treaties and an Executive Order. The basic questions relate to what part of the pertinent land is within Indian Country as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1151 and what is the effect and application of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13. Section 1362, 28 U.S.C., confers federal jurisdiction. The comprehensive opinion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. David Sohappy, Sr., United States of America v. David Sohappy, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- HRI, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.