Legal Opinion
William E. Cody v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1961No. 394PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
Dr. William E. Cody filed application for social security benefits on the theory that he had been an employee of Doctors Bettler and Beye from June 1, 1955 until August 1, 1957, thereby qualifying for such benefits under the Social Security Act, as amended, Title 42 U.S. C.A. § 401 et seq. The Bureau of Old-Age and Survivors Insurance of the Social Security Administration ruled adversely to appellant, and a referee of the Appeals Council, after a hearing, found that appellant was not an employee of Doctors Bettler and Beye and that he was not entitled to old-age…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- William E. Cody v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Bridie v. RibicoffDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961