Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Lee Wilson Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 17, 1947No. 4-8094PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
A suit filed in the chancery court — by the Bank of Wilson to recover judgment against appellant and appellee, and to foreclose a crop and chattel mortgage — has been converted into a damage suit between the appellant and the appellee who were defendants below; and thus reaches us on appeal and cross-appeal: appellant claiming the damages (awarded by the chancery court) are too small, and appellee claiming there should be no damages. The facts are complicated, and the evidence is in hopeless conflict.
FACTS
On March 6, 1944, the appellee, Lee Wilson & Company (a trust…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cherry v. BrizzolaraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Ingham Lumber Co. v. IngersollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Harrington v. BlohmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Morrison v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Lake Village Implement Company v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Heeb v. PrysockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Quality Truck Equipment Co. v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.