Legal Opinion
State v. Bloomfield Construction Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The real party plaintiff in interest in this case was the Aetna Life Insurance Company which had paid a judgment rendered against the nominal plaintiff in favor of Duane H. Clement on account of an injury due to a defective highway under the control of the highway commissioner. The insurance company claimed to be subrogated to the rights of the state. The suit was predicated on the terms of a contract entered into by the named defendant, the Century Indemnity Company, the other defendant being surety on the construction bond. The defendants attack the finding and the conclusions based thereon.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Gino's Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Burr v. LichtenheimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Dolores Schneider v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Greater Hartford Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Data General Corp. v. Citizens National BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.