Legal Opinion

Babb v. Weemer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1964No. Civ. 27543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Attorney Jerrell Babb and his wife, Joan Babb, brought an action against defendant Rose L. Weemer (formerly known as Rose L. Snell) for damages for the alleged breach of an implied covenant in a grant deed and to recover certain costs paid by plaintiffs to prevent foreclosure by defendant of a second trust deed held by defendant upon the subject real property. The trial court entered judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs on both counts, from which judgment plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant formerly owned the subject property, and, on July 5, 1956, executed a promissory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Lippman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cohen v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Kapelus v. Newport Equity Funds, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. FratesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API