Shepard v. Tulare Irr. Dist.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
On Demurrer to Complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, who is a citizen and resident of the state of Michigan, sues to recover upon interest coupons issued by the defendant, an irrigation district created under a statute of the state of California, known as the “Wright Irrigation Act.” The plaintiff alleges the due organization of said district, the issuance of the bonds to which said coupons were attached, and that the plaintiff is a bona fide holder thereof. Defendant has interposed a demurrer to the complaint, gn the various grounds hereinafter noticed, and the present hearing is on said demurrer. Said act…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hyde v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Mercer County v. HacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County v. Municipal Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of BurbankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- City of Santa Cruz v. WaiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- C. D. Mathews Estate, Inc. v. Olive Branch DrainageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.