Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 19, 1984PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
In this case we consider one aspect of the staggering problems associated with the release of hazardous substances into our environment. Cleanup and removal efforts have been authorized by the State through the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.11z (Spill Fund), and by the federal government pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S. C.A. §§ 9601-9657 (Superfund). This appeal focuses on the taxing structures established by each of the foregoing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. DownieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Galo Coba v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.