Legal Opinion

Frandsen v. Mayer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1967No. 8333PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining the defendant Mayer from maintaining a commercial sign on property adjacent to the plaintiffs’ property. The defendants demand a trial de novo.

The facts can be summarized briefly. On March 2, 1959, the defendant Mayer entered into an oral agreement with the City of Jamestown whereby he agreed to give a strip of land 20 feet by 549 feet to *296the city for street purposes, and in consideration thereof the city agreed to permit the defendant to keep and maintain an advertising sign he had had on the strip of land for several years. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burgum v. HookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Farmers Union Oil Co. v. KilgoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moran v. MoranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hale v. Ward CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Coolen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Nordquist v. AlongeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Nordquist v. AlongeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API