In Re Schenk
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by the warden of the California State Prison, that he has served his legal and lawful term of imprisonment without benefit of good time credits, and that the judgment-commitments held by said warden are void for uncertainty. He further alleges that on October 28, 1936, he was charged in four informations filed in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco with four separate offenses, two being robbery, one assault with a deadly weapon, and the other a violation of section 2, chapter 339, of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Dyer v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949