Hockett v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
By writ of review petitioner seeks to annul an award of the respondent commission which denied him a penalty pursuant to section 5814 of the Labor Code, of 10 per cent on certain items of the commission’s award to him.
Petitioner, in the scope and course of his employment, sustained injuries which required medical care and hospital treatment. Despite the report of its own examining physician that petitioner had sustained a disabling injury, the employer’s compensation insurance carrier denied liability and refused to make payments of compensation or to provide medical and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bige v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Ramsey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Langer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Consani v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.