Legal Opinion

Consani v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Safeway Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1991No. A049648PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

This case presents a question on which courts of appeal have divided in interpreting the penalty provisions of Labor Code 1 section 5814 after the Supreme Court’s decision in Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 815 [153 Cal.Rptr. 590, 591 P.2d 1242].

We will hold, in annulling and remanding the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), that the “entire amount” of a particular class of workers’ compensation benefits, on which the 10 percent penalty provided by section 5814 is calculated, includes all nondelayed voluntary payments of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Davison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Scalice v. Performance Cleaning SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. (PC) Figueroa v. Clark.District Court, E.D. California · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API