Consani v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Safeway Stores, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, J.
This case presents a question on which courts of appeal have divided in interpreting the penalty provisions of Labor Code 1 section 5814 after the Supreme Court’s decision in Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 815 [153 Cal.Rptr. 590, 591 P.2d 1242].
We will hold, in annulling and remanding the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), that the “entire amount” of a particular class of workers’ compensation benefits, on which the 10 percent penalty provided by section 5814 is calculated, includes all nondelayed voluntary payments of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Scalice v. Performance Cleaning SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- (PC) Figueroa v. Clark.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.