Legal Opinion

In Matter of Protection of Property of Adam

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2008No. 28158Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTECTION OF THE PROPERTY OF MICHELE ADAM, the Protected Person.

No. 28158

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

February 26, 2008.

On the briefs:

Richard Adam, Respondent-Appellant.

Mark Van Pernis and Gary W. Vancil, (Van Pernis — Vancil), for Petitioner-Appellee.

Jerel I. Yamamoto, (Nakamoto, Okamoto & Yamamoto), Successor Guardian of the Property-Appellee.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER

RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAMURA and FUJISE, JJ.

Respondent-Appellant Richard Louis Adam (Adam), appearing pro se, appeals from he Judgment of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (probate court),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bettencourt v. BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Aga v. HundahlHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. O'CONNOR v. Diocese of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Yee Marn v. ReynoldsHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API