Legal Opinion

Yee Marn v. Reynolds

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1961No. 4200PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

TSUKIYAMA, C. J.

Appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal assigns, as first ground for urging dismissal, the alleged unseasonable taking by appellant of his appeal to this court. They con tend that appellant’s oral motion for rehearing made during a hearing on January 30, 1960, was not of such substance as to toll the time for appeal. The stated ground of the motion for rehearing was that the court’s decision was contrary to the law and the evidence and not within the scope of the pleadings.

The record in this case shows that in a suit for money had and received, the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Deena Products Co. v. United Brick & Clay Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bettencourt v. BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lindauer v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Appeal of GoodfaderHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. King v. Ilikai Properties, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API