Legal Opinion

American Cyanamid Company v. Nathan Sharff Sidney Martin Fox

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 8, 1962No. 14036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, adjudging the appellant Fox in contempt of court. The contempt charged is a civil one.

Fox had been required to appear as a witness for the taking of his pre-trial deposition in the action between American Cyanamid Company, the plaintiff, and Nathan Sharif, the defendant.

Fox moved to set aside the notice of examination, and to stay the examination itself. These motions were denied. Cy-anamid then moved to compel Fox to answer the questions propounded in the examination before…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Lewis KatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Ryan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Ralph E. Smith, D/B/A Televideo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Mississippi State Bar v. ATTORNEY LMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re U. S. Hoffman Can Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API