(PC) Flannery v. Holstein
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORVAL FLANNERY, No. 2:22-cv-01518 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 HOLSTEIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff proceeds on a claim that defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights when plaintiff 19 was subject to an involuntary cavity search. Presently before the court is defendants’ fully 20 briefed motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.