Legal Opinion

The Petroleum No. 5

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 15, 1930No. 170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

In this cause libelant Louis Kelley and his next friend, M. C. Kelley recovered judgment against Higman Towing Company, Petroleum Navigation Company, and Ivy Ilfrey for certain sums and costs. The decree provided that should any one of the defendants pay more than one-third of the amount recovered by libelants, he should have process against the other defendants for the over-plus. It was further provided: “All costs *269herein are adjudged against the three respondents named above and their sureties, if any, and shall be paid one third by eaeh.”

A statement of the costs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
  2. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916
  3. Marks v. Merrill Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  4. Tuck v. OldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1886
  5. Fredericksen v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  2. Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. Barth v. Bayou Candy Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
  5. Hubble Towing Co. v. Chas. R. McCormick Lumber Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API