Legal Opinion

National Bank of Anaconda v. Yegen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1928No. 6,334PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This action was brought for the purpose 'of having set aside a conveyance of certain real property made by the defendant Laura B. Yegen to her daughter, Virginia Yegen (now Virginia Yegen O’Meara), on March 4, 1924, and to subject the same to the satisfaction of a judgment for $8,230.72 and interest thereon, rendered against the defendant Laura B. Yegen and in favor of the plaintiff on December 30, 1924. The lands involved consist of four separate parcels:(1) A tract of about twenty acres, described by metes and bounds and designated as the westerly half of lot 6 in section 2, township 1…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mitchell v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Bicocchi v. Casey-Swasey Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montana National Bank v. MichelsMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. McLaughlin v. CorcoranMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fousek v. DeforestMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Kranjcec v. BelinakMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Davies v. Montana Auto Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API