Legal Opinion

Petersmark 766394 v. Burgess

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 5, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00604Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ JOSEPH ROBERT PETERSMARK, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-604 v. Honorable Ray Kent MICHAEL BURGESS et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court will grant Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate…

2Cases cited145 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API