Legal Opinion

Greig v. Goord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 2, 1999No. Docket No. 97-9340PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Per curiam

James C. Greig appeals pro se from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Richard J. Arcara, Judge), dismissing his complaint for failure to comply with the exhaustion requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Greig argues on appeal, inter alia, that § 1997e(a) applies only to suits brought “by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility,” and that because he had already been released from custody by the time he filed his complaint, he was not required to comply with the exhaustion requirements of the section. We agree, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James W. Kerr v. Steven PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Doe v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Page v. TorreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Ahmed v. DragovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Chase v. PeayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API