McCord v. Oakland Quicksilver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
—The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are and have been owners and tenants in common of “The Lost Ledge ” mining claim, the plaintiff McCord owning two hundred three-thousandth parts thereof; the plaintiff Griffith, three hundred and sixty three-thousandth parts thereof; the plaintiff Gibbs, one hundred and thirty-three and one third three-thousandth parts thereof; the plaintiff Pond, sixty-six and two thirds three-thousandth parts thereof; and the defendant twenty-two hundred and forty three-thousandth parts thereof.
That the defendant, “without authority or permission of the plaintiffs, or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Pico v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. East Jersey Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Shiels v. StarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Delaney v. RootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- White v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.