Legal Opinion

Vaden v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1989No. S-2443, S-2500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This petition arises out of convictions of two hunting guides, Douglas Vaden and Floyd Saltz, Jr., following undercover operations by the State of Alaska. The primary issue we address is whether allegedly illegal conduct by the undercover agents warrants reversal of the convictions. The court of appeals, in a plurality decision with one judge dissenting, affirmed Va-den’s conviction. Vaden v. State, 742 P.2d 784 (Alaska App.1987). It also affirmed Saltz’s conviction. Saltz v. State, MO & J No. 1510 (Alaska App.1987). We granted hearing pursuant to Appellate Rule 304.

I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Kinsella v. United States Ex Rel. SingletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. Irvin Williams, Ronald Gene Sears, Morris L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. State v. ChanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Belarde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  4. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  5. Vaden v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API