Legal Opinion

Estate of St. Martin v. Hixson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2014No. 2010-CT-00380-SCTPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. James Forbes settled his personal-injury action while he was represented by Louis St. Martin. Forbes later sued St. Martin, challenging the validity of his contingency-fee arrangement with St. Martin and the associated attorneys’ fees. The Chancery Court of Harrison County granted summary judgment to St. Martin; the Court of Appeals reversed the chancery court’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. We reverse the Court of Appeals’ judgment and find that summary judgment in favor of St. Martin was proper.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1

¶ 2. In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Buckel v. ChaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Petro Harvester Operating Comp v. David KeiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Dalton Trigg v. Steven Farese, Sr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Czerala-Chatham v. State ex rel. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Elizabeth Graham v. James R. Jamie Franks, Jr.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  5. Tremayne Whitlock v. Albert NecaiseCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API