Legal Opinion
Gold v. Intersoft Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
This is an action for declaratory judgment and for libel. The defendant Alkoff, and his attorneys, who were also named as defendants, have moved to dismiss the libel causes of action on the ground that the alleged libelous communication is to be accorded an absolute privilege.
Plaintiff Gold and defendant Alkoff were formerly the sole shareholders, directors and officers of Intersoft Corp., the corporate defendant. Financial conditions made it imperative that they bring in new investors and pursuant to a new shareholder’s agreement, plaintiff Gold…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alkoff v. GoldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985