Weadock v. Judge of the Recorder's Court of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Bernard F. Weadock to compel William F. Connolly, judge of the recorder’s court of Detroit, to vacate certain orders dismissing complaints for the violation of an ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtMoAlvay, J.
This is an application by relator, who is assistant corporation counsel for the city of Detroit, for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to vacate certain orders made by him, dismissing two cases brought by the proper authorities under an ordinance of the city *377of Detroit. The undisputed facts are that two complaints were duly made, and two cases instituted in said court against Moses Rosenzweig, one complaint charging him with unlawfully and wilfully establishing and maintaining, at a specified location, “a place for the storage of junk, rags, old rope, papers, bagging, old iron, brass,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Taylor v. Bay City Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Churchill v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vermont Salvage Corp. v. Village of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- Town of Clinton v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Shurman v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Makos v. PrinceSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.