Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Union Trust Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1904No. Docket No. 6PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bertha Fischer presented a claim against the estate of William Fischer, Sr., deceased, for damages for an alleged breach of a covenant in a deed. The claim was allowed . by the commissioners, and the Union Trust Company, administrator, appealed to the circuit court. There was judgment for claimant on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bertha Fischer presented a claim against the estate of William Fischer, Sr., deceased, for damages for an alleged breach of a covenant in a deed. The claim was allowed . by the commissioners, and the Union Trust Company, administrator, appealed to the circuit court. There was judgment for claimant on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error. On December 21, 1895, William Fischer, Sr., conveyed by warranty deed certain property in the city of Detroit to the claimant, Bertha Fischer, his daughter, who had been incompetent for a number of years, and…

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

(after stating the facts). 1. The facts and circumstances of the delivery of the deed are nqt in dispute. Counsel differ only in the conclusion to be drawn from them. We think that the conceded facts show a delivery. After the deed was signed and acknowledged, the grantor made manual delivery of it to the grantee. She took it and handed it to her brother, evidently to be kept by him for her. The grantor reserved no control over it, and retained no right to withdraw or cancel it. He never attempted to. Under those circumstances the delivery was complete.

3. The meritorious question in the case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Harvey v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1822
  3. West v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Duvoll v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Mason v. MouldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brainard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  2. State Bank v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Board of Control of Eastern Michigan University v. BurgessMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In Re DUKE ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Cockrell v. McKennaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API