Legal Opinion

Berns v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 17, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBueord, C.J.

This appeal is from a decree modifying a final decree in compliance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in that regard. Berns et al. vs. Harrison, filed January 17, 1931, reported 131 Sou. 654. Complying with the mandate the Chancellor allowed the pleadings amended and testimony taken and then eliminated the sum of $2,000.00 allowed in the final decree for solicitor’s fees. This left a balance due the complainant, after applying the proceeds of sale under the foreclosure, in the sum of $8,459.10. The Chancellor then re-affirmed the deficiency decree for the sum of $2131.15, of which Order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berns v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama-Florida Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Watson v. Stockton Morris Plan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Courtright v. TunnicliffeSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Thompson v. BeitiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Harry Clifford PorterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API