Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Braverman v. Vitullo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1948No. 31575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The hoards of elections rejected in toto seven petition papers containing a total of 171 names, because the petition papers each bore signatures of persons whose addresses were not in the same county.

Section 4785-91, General Code, authorizing nominating petitions for independent candidates, requires that “each such nominating petition containing signatures of electors of more than one county shall consist of separate petition papers each of which shall contain signatures of electors of only one county.” (Italics ours.) A similar requirement appears in the seventh paragraph of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Steuben School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Koehler v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Burgstaller v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Lemert v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Raines v. TobinOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Protest Filed with the Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Bible v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Jedlicka v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API