Legal Opinion

State v. Ohlson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2007No. 78238-5PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Fairhurst, J.

James Douglas Ohlson was convicted of two counts of assault in the second degree following a *5jury trial at which one victim, L.F., testified and the other victim, D.L., did not. Ohlson appeals his conviction on the grounds that D.L.’s out-of-court statements were improperly admitted as excited utterances and that admitting the statements violated Ohlson’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting D.L.’s statements as excited utterances. While we reject the Court of Appeals’ per se rule that excited utterances…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. KoslowskiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KoslowskiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API