Legal Opinion

State v. Koslowski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2009No. 80427-3PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 — Petitioner Duane Koslowski maintains that his right to confrontation was violated when police officers testified about statements made to them by the victim of his charged offenses when the officers responded to a 911 call. The victim died before trial and was unavailable to testify. The question is whether the victim’s statements to the officers were testimonial and, if so, whether their admission at trial was harmless error. We hold that the statements were testimonial and their admission at trial was not harmless. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

¶2 Mr. Koslowski was…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. BasilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API