State v. Stewardson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant argues that evidence of the result of the breathalyzer test should have been suppressed because the arrest was illegal. Defendant urges that he was arrested without a warrant for the misdemeanor of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. From this basic premise he argues that none of the circumstances required by statute to authorize an arrest without a warrant for a misdemeanor was shown to exist in this case, id est, no showing of probable cause to believe that defendant had committed an offense in the officer’s presence (G.S. 15A-401 [b] [1]), and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. HewittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. ShaddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. CrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985