Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1977No. 767SC696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues that it was error to permit Deputy Moody to give his opinion of the speed of the defendant’s vehicle while it was traveling on Sunset Avenue and at the time of the wreck. This argument is without merit. Deputy Moody was in pursuit of defendant’s vehicle for a long while. He observed it on Highway 64, on Winstead Avenue, and on Sunset Avenue. Defendant’s vehicle was in the deputy’s view at the time of the impact. The inconsistencies which defendant maintains he developed in the deputy’s testimony on cross-examination, if inconsistencies were in fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. ShinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. MakersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API