United States Ex Rel. Durham v. Prospect Waterproofing, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
This case presents the question of how much of a dismissed False Claims Act suit should remain under seal. Relator Thomas Durham and the United States have different opinions. Under the applicable six-factor analysis the caselaw prescribes, the Court believes the Government has the better argument.
I. Background
Relator Thomas Durham filed this action on November 15, 2010, under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., alleging that his employer, Prospect Waterproofing Company, had falsely certified its payrolls, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Harold D. Johnson, M.D. v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- American Civil Liberties Union v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Zapp v. Zhenli Ye GonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- ['GUTTENBERG v. EMERY']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States of America Ex Rel Sanjay Grover v. Related Companies, L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- American Professional Agency, Inc. v. NASW Assurance Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.