Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gibson v. Gunsch

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 10, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 8167Published

1DissentJacobson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Rule 404, Arizona Rules of Evidence, operates to exclude circumstantial use of character evidence in all civil cases, *419adopting the opinion of Division Two of this Court in Blankinship v. Duarte, 137 Ariz. 217, 669 P.2d 994 (App.1983).

I have previously concurred in an opinion which adopted the Blankinship rationale. Bell v. State, 143 Ariz. 305, 693 P.2d 960 (App.1984). I am now convinced that Blankinship was incorrectly decided and that my concurrence in Bell, on that particular point, was mistaken.

Rule 404(a)(2), Arizona Rules of Evidence,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Joel Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Robinson v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Niemeyer v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API