Gibson v. Gunsch
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentJacobson, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Rule 404, Arizona Rules of Evidence, operates to exclude circumstantial use of character evidence in all civil cases, *419adopting the opinion of Division Two of this Court in Blankinship v. Duarte, 137 Ariz. 217, 669 P.2d 994 (App.1983).
I have previously concurred in an opinion which adopted the Blankinship rationale. Bell v. State, 143 Ariz. 305, 693 P.2d 960 (App.1984). I am now convinced that Blankinship was incorrectly decided and that my concurrence in Bell, on that particular point, was mistaken.
Rule 404(a)(2), Arizona Rules of Evidence,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Joel Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Robinson v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Niemeyer v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.