Andres v. Fry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The defendants were sued upon their personal liability as stockholders of the Eureka Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this state.
The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the court found “ that the agreement was duly executed and delivered by the corporation to the plaintiff, and that the officers of said corporation who executed said agreement were duly authorized so to do”; and further found in favor of plaintiff on all other issues, and rendered judgment accordingly.
The defendants have appealed from the judgment and from an order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Lovett v. Steam Saw Mill Ass'nNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Underhill v. Santa Barbara Land, Building, & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Abbott v. '76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. WickliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Greve v. Echo Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Tobb Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Young v. Canada, Atlantic & Plant Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912