Legal Opinion

Tate v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1992No. 88-CF-1234PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant Melvin Tate of robbery, D.C.Code § 22-2901 (1989), as a result of a purse-snatching incident on May 24, 1987. Appellant contends on appeal that, by excusing for cause a potential juror who stated that he was unavailable to serve on the jury because the trial schedule would conflict with his participation in a Veterans Administration methadone maintenance program, the trial court violated appellant’s right under the Sixth Amendment to trial by a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community. Appellant further argues that the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Hobbs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Darnell Mason v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API