Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Winn
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided July 1, 1993No. 01-92-00702-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.
We withdraw our opinion, we substitute the following opinion in its stead, and overrule appellant’s motion for rehearing.
This is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of Dallas Winn (Winn) and Regional Investigators, Inc. (Regional), appellees. We affirm.
Philomena Di-Minno Hudson (Hudson), appellant, sued appellees for alleged tor-tious cpnduct committed by Winn while being employed by Regional. The trial court rendered a default judgment against Winn and Regional. 1 We reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American StatesmanTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Cook v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ramo, Inc. v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Humphrey v. Camelot Retirement Community, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Grider v. Mike O'Brien, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Gillingham v. StephensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Taco Cabana, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Pena v. Van, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.