Legal Opinion

Pena v. Van

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 21, 1997No. 01-96-00688-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment, granted in the defendant’s favor, in a lawsuit arising out of the assault and murder of two young girls. We examine whether proximate and superseding cause may be decided as a matter of law in the context of this summary judgment. We reverse.

Facts

The following facts are undisputed. Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, were brutally sexually assaulted and murdered by gang members when they happened across the gang’s initiation ceremony late one night. Five of the assailants, all 17 to 18 years old, were tried, convicted,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Phan Son Van v. PenaTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cigna Insurance Co. of Texas v. Rubalcada, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  3. Gill v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Moritz v. Bueche, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Galveston Newspapers, Inc. v. Norris, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API