Legal Opinion

State v. LeBlanc

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 14, 2000No. 99-182PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

In this case, we address the issue we declined to reach in the recent decision, State v. Carpenter, 170 Vt. 371, 377, 749 A.2d 1137, 1141 (2000), namely, whether the savings clause that accompanied the 1991 amendment to 23 V.S.A. § 1210(d) is available to a defendant who had already been convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) three times at the time of the amendment. This is an interlocutory appeal from a decision of the district court granting defendant Andre LeBlanc’s motion to dismiss the DUI, fifth offense charge against him, and amending the charge to DUI, second offense. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. In re SpencerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Payne v. US Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API