Legal Opinion

Wakshul v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1998No. Civil Action 96-5390PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Gary and Karen Wakshul bring this suit against the City of Philadelphia (“the City”) and two police officers, Kenneth Fleming (“Fleming”) and Jean-Pierre Langan (“Langan”), asserting federal civil rights claims and state law claims for assault, battery, conspiracy, infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. Currently pending before me are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by Fleming and Langan, and one filed by the City.

I. Factual Background

The following facts are either not in dispute, or are presented in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McInerney v. Moyer Lumber and Hardware, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Weaver v. Franklin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. DeBellis v. KulpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Garcia v. County of Bucks, PA.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API